<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adding Value in a Copyright-Adverse Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/22/beyond-copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/22/beyond-copyright/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues That Impact Virtual Worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 04:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyn vandeverre</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/22/beyond-copyright/#comment-15470</link>
		<dc:creator>cyn vandeverre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/22/copyright/#comment-15470</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, and one which further points out a puzzle I have had this week.

One well-known creator&#039;s work was copied and distributed for free as an apparently ill-researched attempt at political protest against a charity the creator supported.  The creator felt &quot;forced&quot; to then turn the item into a freebie.

I&#039;ve been wondering why the creator did this.  Surely the people who found out about it and supported the creator&#039;s work, would still be happy to buy it at the regular price, a choice illustrated by several of the principles in The Technium&#039;s article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, and one which further points out a puzzle I have had this week.</p>
<p>One well-known creator&#8217;s work was copied and distributed for free as an apparently ill-researched attempt at political protest against a charity the creator supported.  The creator felt &#8220;forced&#8221; to then turn the item into a freebie.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been wondering why the creator did this.  Surely the people who found out about it and supported the creator&#8217;s work, would still be happy to buy it at the regular price, a choice illustrated by several of the principles in The Technium&#8217;s article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escort DeFarge</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/22/beyond-copyright/#comment-15434</link>
		<dc:creator>Escort DeFarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/22/copyright/#comment-15434</guid>
		<description>Essential reading for all creators in Second Life! One aspect that wasn&#039;t fully explored was market exploitation by resale of copies, but the general gist was well thought out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Essential reading for all creators in Second Life! One aspect that wasn&#8217;t fully explored was market exploitation by resale of copies, but the general gist was well thought out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
