<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Third-Party Motion in World of Warcraft Bot Case Accuses Blizzard of&#8230; Well&#8230; Beats Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/11/05/riches-warcraft-motion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/11/05/riches-warcraft-motion/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues That Impact Virtual Worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 04:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Third-Party Motion in World of Warcraft Bot Case Accuses Blizzard &#8230; &#124; Legal News Directory</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/11/05/riches-warcraft-motion/#comment-44876</link>
		<dc:creator>Third-Party Motion in World of Warcraft Bot Case Accuses Blizzard &#8230; &#124; Legal News Directory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=1606#comment-44876</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more detail on Legal News Directory &#8211; General Legal News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more detail on Legal News Directory &#8211; General Legal News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonycat</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/11/05/riches-warcraft-motion/#comment-20496</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonycat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=1606#comment-20496</guid>
		<description>&quot;I can think of plenty more rational arguments against Blizzard why couldn’t they?&quot;

Your arguments are not rational, and wouldn&#039;t hold up in court.  But if you feel that they are, you may also file an amicus brief.  I&#039;m sure the presiding judge could use the laughter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I can think of plenty more rational arguments against Blizzard why couldn’t they?&#8221;</p>
<p>Your arguments are not rational, and wouldn&#8217;t hold up in court.  But if you feel that they are, you may also file an amicus brief.  I&#8217;m sure the presiding judge could use the laughter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymouse</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/11/05/riches-warcraft-motion/#comment-20289</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 05:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=1606#comment-20289</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that Blizzard is conducting a bait and switch by selling something as a game but having a EULA that contradicts a games purpose which is to have fun.

When I go to the store to buy a game I expect that I should be able to play it with thirdparty software that improves the game play as long as it does not modify the game.  

It this is not allowed then WoW should be required to be sold in a non game section since it is not being sold as a game and instead being turned into a legal tool where they want to pretend that the game is real and real world rules apply.

Also, I suspect that WoW has NPCs and they are bots yet they are not removed despite being third party software from the game client and not human played characters.

I can think of plenty more rational arguments against Blizzard why couldn&#039;t they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that Blizzard is conducting a bait and switch by selling something as a game but having a EULA that contradicts a games purpose which is to have fun.</p>
<p>When I go to the store to buy a game I expect that I should be able to play it with thirdparty software that improves the game play as long as it does not modify the game.  </p>
<p>It this is not allowed then WoW should be required to be sold in a non game section since it is not being sold as a game and instead being turned into a legal tool where they want to pretend that the game is real and real world rules apply.</p>
<p>Also, I suspect that WoW has NPCs and they are bots yet they are not removed despite being third party software from the game client and not human played characters.</p>
<p>I can think of plenty more rational arguments against Blizzard why couldn&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Channel Massive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Episode 66 - The Unboxing</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/11/05/riches-warcraft-motion/#comment-19888</link>
		<dc:creator>Channel Massive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Episode 66 - The Unboxing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=1606#comment-19888</guid>
		<description>[...] for Champions Online I&#8217;ll buy that for a dollar!  Errr&#8230;I&#8217;m mean 96 cents. Third-Party Motion in WoW vs Bots Thieves steal 4000 copies of Age of Conan.  Ask for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Champions Online I&#8217;ll buy that for a dollar!  Errr&#8230;I&#8217;m mean 96 cents. Third-Party Motion in WoW vs Bots Thieves steal 4000 copies of Age of Conan.  Ask for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Duranske</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/11/05/riches-warcraft-motion/#comment-19835</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Duranske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=1606#comment-19835</guid>
		<description>This quote from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jonathan_Lee_Riches&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia discussion page regarding his entry&lt;/a&gt; seems to sum it up: &quot;He is widely regarded to be a very clever comic essayist who&#039;s chosen lawsuits as his medium. Or else he&#039;s nuts, no one&#039;s really sure.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This quote from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jonathan_Lee_Riches" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/en.wikipedia.org');">Wikipedia discussion page regarding his entry</a> seems to sum it up: &#8220;He is widely regarded to be a very clever comic essayist who&#8217;s chosen lawsuits as his medium. Or else he&#8217;s nuts, no one&#8217;s really sure.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tateru Nino</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/11/05/riches-warcraft-motion/#comment-19834</link>
		<dc:creator>Tateru Nino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=1606#comment-19834</guid>
		<description>This guy&#039;s filed more than a thousand cases. I suppose everyone needs a hobby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guy&#8217;s filed more than a thousand cases. I suppose everyone needs a hobby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Lee Riches© &#124; Kill Ten Rats</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/11/05/riches-warcraft-motion/#comment-19832</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Lee Riches© &#124; Kill Ten Rats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=1606#comment-19832</guid>
		<description>[...] monks,&#8221; Denny&#8217;s, &#8220;Vern Minni Me,&#8221; Michael J. Fox, PETA, Liberty Bell&#8230; Virtually Blind reports that he has filed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] monks,&#8221; Denny&#8217;s, &#8220;Vern Minni Me,&#8221; Michael J. Fox, PETA, Liberty Bell&#8230; Virtually Blind reports that he has filed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bartle</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/11/05/riches-warcraft-motion/#comment-19830</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bartle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=1606#comment-19830</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you have laws on vexatious litigation in the USA? We do in the UK - there&#039;s even an online list of the 190 extant vexatious litigants (http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/infoabout/vexatious_litigant/index.htm). Riches would be the 191st on that list if he tried this kind of thing in our courts.

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you have laws on vexatious litigation in the USA? We do in the UK &#8211; there&#8217;s even an online list of the 190 extant vexatious litigants (<a href="http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/infoabout/vexatious_litigant/index.htm" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk');">http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/infoabout/vexatious_litigant/index.htm</a>). Riches would be the 191st on that list if he tried this kind of thing in our courts.</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whatever: Inmate Sues Blizzard Over Addiction &#171; Techtronic Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/11/05/riches-warcraft-motion/#comment-19829</link>
		<dc:creator>Whatever: Inmate Sues Blizzard Over Addiction &#171; Techtronic Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=1606#comment-19829</guid>
		<description>[...] same claims about Grand Theft Auto 4 when he sued Rockstar Games earlier this year. According to Virtually Blind, he&#8217;s also taken the time to sue George Bush, Michael Vick, National Public Radio, Barry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] same claims about Grand Theft Auto 4 when he sued Rockstar Games earlier this year. According to Virtually Blind, he&#8217;s also taken the time to sue George Bush, Michael Vick, National Public Radio, Barry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paks</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/11/05/riches-warcraft-motion/#comment-19827</link>
		<dc:creator>Paks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=1606#comment-19827</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Riches mind became a living video game.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Simply classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Riches mind became a living video game.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Simply classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
