http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/06/20/blizzard-responds/ Legal Issues That Impact Virtual Worlds Tue, 13 May 2014 04:03:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/06/20/blizzard-responds/#comment-20571 Blizzard’s Lawsuit Against Glider Coming To A Close | DailyWarcraft.com Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:52:13 +0000 http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=311#comment-20571 [...] immense power.  More thoughts on the far-reaching topic by Terra Nova, Ars Technica and then Blizzard’s response to Public Knowledge’s [...] [...] immense power.  More thoughts on the far-reaching topic by Terra Nova, Ars Technica and then Blizzard’s response to Public Knowledge’s [...]

]]> http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/06/20/blizzard-responds/#comment-18224 Living in WoW Blog » Blizzard v/s WOW Glider Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:43:11 +0000 http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=311#comment-18224 [...] Nachtrag mit neuem Link (2008-06-21): Virtually Blind: Blizzard Responds to Amicus Brief in MDY Bot Suit [...] [...] Nachtrag mit neuem Link (2008-06-21): Virtually Blind: Blizzard Responds to Amicus Brief in MDY Bot Suit [...]

]]> http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/06/20/blizzard-responds/#comment-17898 WoW-Glider und DMCA - Teil 2 « LunaHexe.blog Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:03:50 +0000 http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=311#comment-17898 [...] man in der Zwischenzeit so hört und liest stimmt mich nicht zuversichtlicher. In den USA gibt es die Möglichkeit daß sich eine [...] [...] man in der Zwischenzeit so hört und liest stimmt mich nicht zuversichtlicher. In den USA gibt es die Möglichkeit daß sich eine [...]

]]> http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/06/20/blizzard-responds/#comment-17882 Blizzard responds to Public Knowledge about WoW Glider | World of Warcraft Blog Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:57:13 +0000 http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=311#comment-17882 [...] now Blizzard has responded to Public Knowledge, and their argument isn’t all that new. They claim that when you “buy” your WoW [...] [...] now Blizzard has responded to Public Knowledge, and their argument isn’t all that new. They claim that when you “buy” your WoW [...]

]]> http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/06/20/blizzard-responds/#comment-17878 Blizzard responds to Public Knowledge about WoW Glider | WarCraft Maniac Tue, 01 Jul 2008 07:12:31 +0000 http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=311#comment-17878 [...] now Blizzard has responded to Public Knowledge, and their argument isn’t all that new. They claim that when you “buy” your WoW [...] [...] now Blizzard has responded to Public Knowledge, and their argument isn’t all that new. They claim that when you “buy” your WoW [...]

]]> http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/06/20/blizzard-responds/#comment-17873 Gaming Blog » Blog Archive » Blizzard responds to Public Knowledge about WoW Glider Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:40:58 +0000 http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=311#comment-17873 [...] now Blizzard has responded to Public Knowledge, and their argument isn’t all that new. They claim that when you “buy” your WoW [...] [...] now Blizzard has responded to Public Knowledge, and their argument isn’t all that new. They claim that when you “buy” your WoW [...]

]]> http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/06/20/blizzard-responds/#comment-17869 MMODump.com » Blog Archive » Blizzard case becoming EULA test case Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:06:48 +0000 http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=311#comment-17869 [...] case becoming EULA test case Blizzard case becoming EULA test case: Blizzard Responds to Amicus Brief in MDY Bot Suit | Virtually Blind | Virtual Law | Benjamin Duransk... Although it has not put the issue in quite such stark terms, Public Knowledge is essentially [...] [...] case becoming EULA test case Blizzard case becoming EULA test case: Blizzard Responds to Amicus Brief in MDY Bot Suit | Virtually Blind | Virtual Law | Benjamin Duransk… Although it has not put the issue in quite such stark terms, Public Knowledge is essentially [...]

]]> http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/06/20/blizzard-responds/#comment-17867 Blizzard responds to Public Knowledge about WoW Glider | Warcraft-News.com Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:00:26 +0000 http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=311#comment-17867 [...] now Blizzard has responded to Public Knowledge, and their argument isn’t all that new. They claim that when you “buy” your WoW [...] [...] now Blizzard has responded to Public Knowledge, and their argument isn’t all that new. They claim that when you “buy” your WoW [...]

]]> http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/06/20/blizzard-responds/#comment-17866 Blizzard responds to Public Knowledge about WoW Glider Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:00:11 +0000 http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=311#comment-17866 [...] now Blizzard has responded to Public Knowledge, and their argument isn’t all that new. They claim that when you “buy” your WoW [...] [...] now Blizzard has responded to Public Knowledge, and their argument isn’t all that new. They claim that when you “buy” your WoW [...]

]]> http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/06/20/blizzard-responds/#comment-17865 Raph's Website » Blizzard case becoming EULA test case Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:54:43 +0000 http://virtuallyblind.com/?p=311#comment-17865 [...] Blizzard Responds to Amicus Brief in MDY Bot Suit | Virtually Blind | Virtual Law | Benjamin Duransk... Although it has not put the issue in quite such stark terms, Public Knowledge is essentially seeking a ruling that says that the sale of consumer software is, in most circumstances, a sale, pretty much regardless of what the agreement that comes with the software says. If the court agrees in spite of MAI and its progeny (and the ruling survives certain appeal) then U.S. copyright law would protect, among other things, making copies of purchased software in RAM in order to use the software — no matter what the “license agreement” says. Resolving this issue in favor of Public Knowledge would call into question provisions in EULAs governing nearly every virtual world and multiuser online game, as well as EULAs for other software. [...] [...] Blizzard Responds to Amicus Brief in MDY Bot Suit | Virtually Blind | Virtual Law | Benjamin Duransk… Although it has not put the issue in quite such stark terms, Public Knowledge is essentially seeking a ruling that says that the sale of consumer software is, in most circumstances, a sale, pretty much regardless of what the agreement that comes with the software says. If the court agrees in spite of MAI and its progeny (and the ruling survives certain appeal) then U.S. copyright law would protect, among other things, making copies of purchased software in RAM in order to use the software — no matter what the “license agreement” says. Resolving this issue in favor of Public Knowledge would call into question provisions in EULAs governing nearly every virtual world and multiuser online game, as well as EULAs for other software. [...]

]]>