Comments on: MDY v. Blizzard Bot Suit Judge Requires Blizzard to Respond to Amicus Brief on Copyright Issues

By: The Evince Blog » Blog Archive » Successfully Investigating Cases in a Virtual Context: Blizzard Wins Summary Judgment Against MDY

Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:18:43 +0000

[...] Since I’m not a lawyer, I will refer any reader who wishes a deeper legal analysis of the issues to the postings made by Ross Dannenberg on The Patent Arcade and Benjamin Duranske on Virtually Blind. [...]

By: Blizzard responds to amicus brief in MDY bot suit | Loot Whores

Blizzard responds to amicus brief in MDY bot suit | Loot Whores — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:03:19 +0000

[...] for purposes of running it is explicitly allowed by copyright law. The judge required Blizzard to respond to the argument last Friday, and Virtually Blind has Blizzard’s response. The basic argument that Blizzard makes is [...]

By: MMODump.com » Blog Archive » Blizzard responds to amicus brief in MDY bot suit

Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:38:35 +0000

[...] for purposes of running it is explicitly allowed by copyright law. The judge required Blizzard to respond to the argument last Friday, and Virtually Blind has Blizzard’s [...]

By: Living in WoW Blog » Blizzard v/s WOW Glider

Living in WoW Blog » Blizzard v/s WOW Glider — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:09:58 +0000

[...] Nachtrag mit neuem Link (2008-06-17): Virtually Blind: MDY v. Blizzard Bot Suit Judge Requires Blizzard to Respond to Amicus Brief on Copyright Issues [...]

By: Ashcroft Burnham

Ashcroft Burnham — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:13:39 +0000

Welcome back, Ben :-) Thank you for covering this issue so thoroughly – it is an extremely important issue to cover for many purposes. My view, as you may know, is strongly aligned with that of Public Knowledge – I am very surprised that this issue was not authoritatively settled many years ago.

I shall look forward to the developments!