<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Settlement Imminent in Suit Alleging Underhanded Dealing at Virtual Property Dealer IGE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/04/08/debonneville-pierce-settlement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/04/08/debonneville-pierce-settlement/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues That Impact Virtual Worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 04:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doubledown Tandino</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/04/08/debonneville-pierce-settlement/#comment-16498</link>
		<dc:creator>Doubledown Tandino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/04/08/debonneville-pierce-settlement/#comment-16498</guid>
		<description>All I really have to say about this is WOW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I really have to say about this is WOW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMO Clerks &#187; IGE founders settle their legal dispute</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/04/08/debonneville-pierce-settlement/#comment-16433</link>
		<dc:creator>MMO Clerks &#187; IGE founders settle their legal dispute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/04/08/debonneville-pierce-settlement/#comment-16433</guid>
		<description>[...] Read&#160;&#124;&#160;Permalink&#160;&#124;&#160;Email this&#160;&#124;&#160;Linking&#160;Blogs&#160;&#124;&#160;Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read&nbsp;|&nbsp;Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Linking&nbsp;Blogs&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larryr</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/04/08/debonneville-pierce-settlement/#comment-16409</link>
		<dc:creator>larryr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/04/08/debonneville-pierce-settlement/#comment-16409</guid>
		<description>hmm,
so after all the &quot;new shiny&quot; of virtual law, it continues to be good old law buisness- settle if you can- that continues to prevail....

and i still dont see any property issues that require new &quot;virtual laws&quot;   just better fairer applications of justice on laws that arent created by suspect special interest means....

im still unconvinced that the thoughts behind the current  moniker of &quot;virtual laws&quot; are just as suspect as special interest laws made during the &quot;non virtual&quot;? lol  past.

soon the need to say &quot;all owned objects/expressions&quot; are equal will resound in a country that will find it&#039;s only exportable valueble in the world is digital pictures/models of Britney&#039;s crotch, or our commentary about them.

&quot;virtual &quot; liberty?-- no REAL liberty at last! welcome the singularity!...

vc3:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm,<br />
so after all the &#8220;new shiny&#8221; of virtual law, it continues to be good old law buisness- settle if you can- that continues to prevail&#8230;.</p>
<p>and i still dont see any property issues that require new &#8220;virtual laws&#8221;   just better fairer applications of justice on laws that arent created by suspect special interest means&#8230;.</p>
<p>im still unconvinced that the thoughts behind the current  moniker of &#8220;virtual laws&#8221; are just as suspect as special interest laws made during the &#8220;non virtual&#8221;? lol  past.</p>
<p>soon the need to say &#8220;all owned objects/expressions&#8221; are equal will resound in a country that will find it&#8217;s only exportable valueble in the world is digital pictures/models of Britney&#8217;s crotch, or our commentary about them.</p>
<p>&#8220;virtual &#8221; liberty?&#8211; no REAL liberty at last! welcome the singularity!&#8230;</p>
<p>vc3:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julynn Lilliehook</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/04/08/debonneville-pierce-settlement/#comment-16408</link>
		<dc:creator>Julynn Lilliehook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/04/08/debonneville-pierce-settlement/#comment-16408</guid>
		<description>When I think of all the money attorneys earn in not defining virtual law with these settlements it makes me angry. If I could get my hands on one of these cases, I&#039;d ride it out and get it before a jury or at least past summary judgment.

Hint, hint.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I think of all the money attorneys earn in not defining virtual law with these settlements it makes me angry. If I could get my hands on one of these cases, I&#8217;d ride it out and get it before a jury or at least past summary judgment.</p>
<p>Hint, hint&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All&#8217;s Well That Ends &#171; Broken Toys</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/04/08/debonneville-pierce-settlement/#comment-16404</link>
		<dc:creator>All&#8217;s Well That Ends &#171; Broken Toys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/04/08/debonneville-pierce-settlement/#comment-16404</guid>
		<description>[...] Well That&#160;Ends  Debonneville v. Pierce to, unsurprisingly, settle out of court. Not much to add beyond Duranske&#8217;s note:  From a virtual law perspective, I’d been hoping [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well That&nbsp;Ends  Debonneville v. Pierce to, unsurprisingly, settle out of court. Not much to add beyond Duranske&#8217;s note:  From a virtual law perspective, I’d been hoping [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
