<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blizzard v. In Game Dollar Update: Injunction Entered, Peons Not 4Hire in World of Warcraft Anymore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues That Impact Virtual Worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 04:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAQ: Can game developers or publishers sue gold farmers / gold sellers directly or indirectly? &#124; MMORPG Game Bots &#38; Hacks Watch</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-80794</link>
		<dc:creator>FAQ: Can game developers or publishers sue gold farmers / gold sellers directly or indirectly? &#124; MMORPG Game Bots &#38; Hacks Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 18:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-80794</guid>
		<description>[...] Blizzard vs In Game Dollar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blizzard vs In Game Dollar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blizzard Urges Paypal To Close Gold Sellers&#8217; PayPal Accounts &#171; Coregamer &#8211; Games news, reviews and discussion.</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-47667</link>
		<dc:creator>Blizzard Urges Paypal To Close Gold Sellers&#8217; PayPal Accounts &#171; Coregamer &#8211; Games news, reviews and discussion.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-47667</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;spamming&#8221; user’s in-game with their wares. Peons4Hire settled with the publisher, resulting in a permanent injunction that barred it from advertising or &#8220;engaging in the sale of World of Warcraft virtual assets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;spamming&#8221; user’s in-game with their wares. Peons4Hire settled with the publisher, resulting in a permanent injunction that barred it from advertising or &#8220;engaging in the sale of World of Warcraft virtual assets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seri sez: This Week in (WoW) History&#8230; &#171; World of Snarkcraft</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-20611</link>
		<dc:creator>Seri sez: This Week in (WoW) History&#8230; &#171; World of Snarkcraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-20611</guid>
		<description>[...] 2008  Blizzard wins lawsuit against Peons4hire. I remember being sooo happy about this, because those Peons4hire spammers were incredibly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2008  Blizzard wins lawsuit against Peons4hire. I remember being sooo happy about this, because those Peons4hire spammers were incredibly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BusyGamer.com [The Official Busy Gamer Website] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Less spam, more ham - oh wait that was just the Gnome that ganked me.</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-20570</link>
		<dc:creator>BusyGamer.com [The Official Busy Gamer Website] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Less spam, more ham - oh wait that was just the Gnome that ganked me.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-20570</guid>
		<description>[...] can fit 8 gnomes in this can (Virtually Blind) - Blizzard’s lawsuit against virtual item and power-leveling company In Game Dollar (doing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can fit 8 gnomes in this can (Virtually Blind) &#8211; Blizzard’s lawsuit against virtual item and power-leveling company In Game Dollar (doing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blizzard Wins an Important Round Against Gold Spammers</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-19092</link>
		<dc:creator>Blizzard Wins an Important Round Against Gold Spammers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-19092</guid>
		<description>[...] reported that Blizzard has secured an injunction against an in-game gold spamming group. Citing an article at Virtually Blind, Mike states the injunction is permanent, and prohibits the defendants from using WoW in-game [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reported that Blizzard has secured an injunction against an in-game gold spamming group. Citing an article at Virtually Blind, Mike states the injunction is permanent, and prohibits the defendants from using WoW in-game [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Living in WoW Blog &#187; Blizzard v/s WOW Glider</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-15997</link>
		<dc:creator>Living in WoW Blog &#187; Blizzard v/s WOW Glider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-15997</guid>
		<description>[...] bereits letztes Jahr gerichtlich gegen Goldverk&#228;ufer vorgegangen ist (Meldung im Forum, Berichterstattung auf virtuallyblind.com, gehen sie jetzt auch gegen die Hersteller von Bot-Software vor. Die genaueren Hintergr&#252;nde, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bereits letztes Jahr gerichtlich gegen Goldverk&#228;ufer vorgegangen ist (Meldung im Forum, Berichterstattung auf virtuallyblind.com, gehen sie jetzt auch gegen die Hersteller von Bot-Software vor. Die genaueren Hintergr&#252;nde, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hercalis</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-15467</link>
		<dc:creator>Hercalis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-15467</guid>
		<description>Good. I am very happy to see that some of these annoying spammers will be gone. I like to mess around on some days and make a new character to lvl 10 or so and cannot stand getting constantly invited to groups just to be asked if i want to hit 60 tonight and if I do visit www.whateversiteidontreallycare.com.

Hopfully more of this will happen. 

Grats Blizz!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. I am very happy to see that some of these annoying spammers will be gone. I like to mess around on some days and make a new character to lvl 10 or so and cannot stand getting constantly invited to groups just to be asked if i want to hit 60 tonight and if I do visit <a href="http://www.whateversiteidontreallycare.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.whateversiteidontreallycare.com');">http://www.whateversiteidontreallycare.com</a>.</p>
<p>Hopfully more of this will happen. </p>
<p>Grats Blizz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-15199</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-15199</guid>
		<description>Brian&#039;s comment is akin to a whole blog post.  This topic has gotten quite a bit of attention since I&#039;ve come here last.  Anyways I&#039;ll have to agree with the auction house statement of people not willing to pay more than what they think an item is worth.

While I&#039;ll probly be labeled as one of the bad people for selling gold, I&#039;m not a gold farmer.  I make my gold off the Auction house buying/selling items daily.  So I know about the limits people want to pay for a certain item etc.

For example if I buy out the whole auction house of Adamantite Ore @ a price of say 25g/stack, and try to resell them at 40g/stack people would still buy them all, however even if control the whole market, and try to sell them at 100g/stack no ones going to buy it.  Rather people will mine it them selves, and I&#039;ll be undercut unless I buy out all competition.

If people want to study gold markets, and its effects on the WoW economy, they should study the US vs EU markets.  Price for gold on EU servers are cheap since they don&#039;t do accounts bans as often as they do in the US.  

China is similar to Europe in which the market is fairly flooded in the market as well.  I wrote a post not too long ago about a rare epic mount that was paid for in gold for the amount of 190,000 gold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian&#8217;s comment is akin to a whole blog post.  This topic has gotten quite a bit of attention since I&#8217;ve come here last.  Anyways I&#8217;ll have to agree with the auction house statement of people not willing to pay more than what they think an item is worth.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;ll probly be labeled as one of the bad people for selling gold, I&#8217;m not a gold farmer.  I make my gold off the Auction house buying/selling items daily.  So I know about the limits people want to pay for a certain item etc.</p>
<p>For example if I buy out the whole auction house of Adamantite Ore @ a price of say 25g/stack, and try to resell them at 40g/stack people would still buy them all, however even if control the whole market, and try to sell them at 100g/stack no ones going to buy it.  Rather people will mine it them selves, and I&#8217;ll be undercut unless I buy out all competition.</p>
<p>If people want to study gold markets, and its effects on the WoW economy, they should study the US vs EU markets.  Price for gold on EU servers are cheap since they don&#8217;t do accounts bans as often as they do in the US.  </p>
<p>China is similar to Europe in which the market is fairly flooded in the market as well.  I wrote a post not too long ago about a rare epic mount that was paid for in gold for the amount of 190,000 gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-15183</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-15183</guid>
		<description>Let me start off by saying that I&#039;m an avid player with recreational playtime. I play on RP realms and I rarely PVP. I have been playing since beta and I remember when prices were reasonable and location based.

Wow, people&#039;s grasp on Economical trending and the &quot;Ripple Effect&quot; is way off. 

1) Ellisper suggested reducing repair costs. The Value of Gold is what makes people go to the auction house; reducing the value of gold does nothing to the farmers. Not buying their stuff, as SamureyeD states, is the best way to reduce the cost of materials; which in turn strengthens the value of the gold. The ripple effect of a strong gold piece is that people aren&#039;t willing to pay 10g for a stack of Copper Ore. Gold farming (and selling) injects massive amounts of gold into an economy which weakens the value (and the amount of work it takes to earn it properly).

2) Increased drop rate does lower costs in the AH, but rarely does it drop the farming of the item. A Depleted Badge (Blue Item) has a drop rate of about 2% on a mob of 70+ (on the plateaus of the Blades Edge Mountian).  An Bind on Equip (BoE) item that has that has a low drop rate has a higher cost on the AH because Low Supply and High demand equate to a high price. This is intentional as if it were easy to get (and thus not Uncommon), they would have made it a quest reward and everybody would have an equally easy chance to get it. 

3) Liquidity in a virtual setting has no effect because there is no limit to the amount of gold availiable. Liquidity only effects closed market systems.

4)Open Market vs. Fair Price: Open Marketing dictates that there is no cap to the price of a good and it is only valued at the price somebody is willing to pay for it. Fair Pricing dictates that any good at a competative price will sell. The AH works exactly as it was designed to do. the AH is not broken, our perception of what it should be used for has.

There is no &quot;Quick fix&quot; to the economic catastrophe that capitalism brings. It requires certain &quot;honest&quot; people to ensure that the value of money remains strong (A weak valued coin has no useful economic value).  A Strong valued coin will regulate inflationary pressures.

As for the annoying spam, the easy solution is to enforce the naming policies....but that will never happen. so we click and report (for all the good it does).

Legally, I hope this sets a precedence to combat the annoying adds I see.

Just my two cents.  Love and peace!

Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me start off by saying that I&#8217;m an avid player with recreational playtime. I play on RP realms and I rarely PVP. I have been playing since beta and I remember when prices were reasonable and location based.</p>
<p>Wow, people&#8217;s grasp on Economical trending and the &#8220;Ripple Effect&#8221; is way off. </p>
<p>1) Ellisper suggested reducing repair costs. The Value of Gold is what makes people go to the auction house; reducing the value of gold does nothing to the farmers. Not buying their stuff, as SamureyeD states, is the best way to reduce the cost of materials; which in turn strengthens the value of the gold. The ripple effect of a strong gold piece is that people aren&#8217;t willing to pay 10g for a stack of Copper Ore. Gold farming (and selling) injects massive amounts of gold into an economy which weakens the value (and the amount of work it takes to earn it properly).</p>
<p>2) Increased drop rate does lower costs in the AH, but rarely does it drop the farming of the item. A Depleted Badge (Blue Item) has a drop rate of about 2% on a mob of 70+ (on the plateaus of the Blades Edge Mountian).  An Bind on Equip (BoE) item that has that has a low drop rate has a higher cost on the AH because Low Supply and High demand equate to a high price. This is intentional as if it were easy to get (and thus not Uncommon), they would have made it a quest reward and everybody would have an equally easy chance to get it. </p>
<p>3) Liquidity in a virtual setting has no effect because there is no limit to the amount of gold availiable. Liquidity only effects closed market systems.</p>
<p>4)Open Market vs. Fair Price: Open Marketing dictates that there is no cap to the price of a good and it is only valued at the price somebody is willing to pay for it. Fair Pricing dictates that any good at a competative price will sell. The AH works exactly as it was designed to do. the AH is not broken, our perception of what it should be used for has.</p>
<p>There is no &#8220;Quick fix&#8221; to the economic catastrophe that capitalism brings. It requires certain &#8220;honest&#8221; people to ensure that the value of money remains strong (A weak valued coin has no useful economic value).  A Strong valued coin will regulate inflationary pressures.</p>
<p>As for the annoying spam, the easy solution is to enforce the naming policies&#8230;.but that will never happen. so we click and report (for all the good it does).</p>
<p>Legally, I hope this sets a precedence to combat the annoying adds I see.</p>
<p>Just my two cents.  Love and peace!</p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth C</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-15178</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 04:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/02/01/peons4hire-blizzard-injunction/#comment-15178</guid>
		<description>Never thought I&#039;d say it but Blizzard should follow Jagex&#039;s footsteps and take ingame actions against goldfarmers but without as much tyranny. As for tons of people quitting runescape, you&#039;re wrong. Not many played in the first place &gt;.&lt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never thought I&#8217;d say it but Blizzard should follow Jagex&#8217;s footsteps and take ingame actions against goldfarmers but without as much tyranny. As for tons of people quitting runescape, you&#8217;re wrong. Not many played in the first place &gt;.&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
