<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Non-Profit &#8220;Virtual Intellectual Property Organization&#8221; Opens Office in Second Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/27/vipo-second-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/27/vipo-second-life/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues That Impact Virtual Worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 04:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Second Life TOS Update 2013-42</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/27/vipo-second-life/#comment-159620</link>
		<dc:creator>Second Life TOS Update 2013-42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 07:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/27/vipo-second-life/#comment-159620</guid>
		<description>[...] There is a machinima recording coming, I think from UCCSL. The Virtual Intellectual Property Rights Organization (VIPO) a RL organization has an office in SL and participated in the panel. I found their contributions especially helpful. (2008 Reference: Non-Profit “Virtual Intellectual Property Organization” Opens Office in Second Life. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is a machinima recording coming, I think from UCCSL. The Virtual Intellectual Property Rights Organization (VIPO) a RL organization has an office in SL and participated in the panel. I found their contributions especially helpful. (2008 Reference: Non-Profit “Virtual Intellectual Property Organization” Opens Office in Second Life. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silos g</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/27/vipo-second-life/#comment-14606</link>
		<dc:creator>silos g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/27/vipo-second-life/#comment-14606</guid>
		<description>http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i29ce7ca58f3334d0975534d77e262f89


I suggest that article from today......
could be the begining of the end for all &quot;non licensed&quot; ip - user generated&quot; incomes within SL and a natural stoppage to other virtual worlds gaining any real audiences WITHOUT properly paying for CONTENT... This i suggest will put a damper on all user gen br worlds since the most popular of &quot;scenecasters&quot; hyped facebook 3d is a simpsons 3d world knockoff....so far it dosent generate lindens..only valuation for scenecasters coffers?

Paramount now is &quot;getting&quot; money for its properties from HABBO and others...thus SL sims and items for sale owned by paramount are next to go...unless HABBO doesnt mind paying for rights, that the kid next door has stolen freely to sell that 1000l$ &quot;Star Trek Bridge Set&quot; in second life.

So if this new SL org is about cleaning up SL, and making it Owner friendly and legal, good for it. You have youre work cut out for you..:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i29ce7ca58f3334d0975534d77e262f89" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.hollywoodreporter.com');">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i29ce7ca58f3334d0975534d77e262f89</a></p>
<p>I suggest that article from today&#8230;&#8230;<br />
could be the begining of the end for all &#8220;non licensed&#8221; ip &#8211; user generated&#8221; incomes within SL and a natural stoppage to other virtual worlds gaining any real audiences WITHOUT properly paying for CONTENT&#8230; This i suggest will put a damper on all user gen br worlds since the most popular of &#8220;scenecasters&#8221; hyped facebook 3d is a simpsons 3d world knockoff&#8230;.so far it dosent generate lindens..only valuation for scenecasters coffers?</p>
<p>Paramount now is &#8220;getting&#8221; money for its properties from HABBO and others&#8230;thus SL sims and items for sale owned by paramount are next to go&#8230;unless HABBO doesnt mind paying for rights, that the kid next door has stolen freely to sell that 1000l$ &#8220;Star Trek Bridge Set&#8221; in second life.</p>
<p>So if this new SL org is about cleaning up SL, and making it Owner friendly and legal, good for it. You have youre work cut out for you..:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtual Worlds Forum Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Today&#8217;s other virtual worlds news (29-Jan-08)</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/27/vipo-second-life/#comment-14595</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtual Worlds Forum Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Today&#8217;s other virtual worlds news (29-Jan-08)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/27/vipo-second-life/#comment-14595</guid>
		<description>[...] Virtual Intellectual Property Organisation opens up in Second Life (link) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Virtual Intellectual Property Organisation opens up in Second Life (link) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taran Rampersad (Nobody Fugazi)</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/27/vipo-second-life/#comment-14591</link>
		<dc:creator>Taran Rampersad (Nobody Fugazi)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/27/vipo-second-life/#comment-14591</guid>
		<description>Good stuff. I had meant to comment yesterday, but... anyway.

I believe that this should be something that a service provider of a synthetic world should provide to users if they are permitting private copyright. I am very glad that someone stepped to the plate for Second Life, and will be following VIPO with interest. 

Good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff. I had meant to comment yesterday, but&#8230; anyway.</p>
<p>I believe that this should be something that a service provider of a synthetic world should provide to users if they are permitting private copyright. I am very glad that someone stepped to the plate for Second Life, and will be following VIPO with interest. </p>
<p>Good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashcroft Burnham</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/27/vipo-second-life/#comment-14552</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashcroft Burnham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2008/01/27/vipo-second-life/#comment-14552</guid>
		<description>I am very pleased to know that Juris finds our progress in the Metaverse Republic exciting - we certainly share that view :-) Juris, it is a great shame that technical trouble prevented you from staying for more than a few seconds of our meeting last week - I do hope that you will be in a better position next week. 

For many people who lack the resources to use first-life courts to deal with their virtual-world-specific IP disputes, or for everybody for whom the value of the IP in question is not enough, in financial terms, for first-life international litigation, but not so low as not to be worth protecting at all, we think that an in-world specific legal system with in-world specific powers of enforcement is the only workable way forward.

For anyone interested in knowing more about the Metaverse Republic, or anyone who wants to join our project (we currently need programmers, project managers, publicists and people knowledgeable in the fields of law and constitutional theory), visit our website (http://www.metaverserepublic.org) for more information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very pleased to know that Juris finds our progress in the Metaverse Republic exciting &#8211; we certainly share that view :-) Juris, it is a great shame that technical trouble prevented you from staying for more than a few seconds of our meeting last week &#8211; I do hope that you will be in a better position next week. </p>
<p>For many people who lack the resources to use first-life courts to deal with their virtual-world-specific IP disputes, or for everybody for whom the value of the IP in question is not enough, in financial terms, for first-life international litigation, but not so low as not to be worth protecting at all, we think that an in-world specific legal system with in-world specific powers of enforcement is the only workable way forward.</p>
<p>For anyone interested in knowing more about the Metaverse Republic, or anyone who wants to join our project (we currently need programmers, project managers, publicists and people knowledgeable in the fields of law and constitutional theory), visit our website (<a href="http://www.metaverserepublic.org" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.metaverserepublic.org');">http://www.metaverserepublic.org</a>) for more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
