<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revisiting &#8220;There&#8221; Reveals Function Over Form</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/05/08/revisiting-there-reveals-function-over-form/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/05/08/revisiting-there-reveals-function-over-form/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues That Impact Virtual Worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 04:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tovorinok</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/05/08/revisiting-there-reveals-function-over-form/#comment-2121</link>
		<dc:creator>tovorinok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 12:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/05/08/revisiting-there-reveals-function-over-form/#comment-2121</guid>
		<description>Hello 
 
Great book. I just want to say what a fantastic thing you are doing! Good luck! 
 
 
Bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello </p>
<p>Great book. I just want to say what a fantastic thing you are doing! Good luck! </p>
<p>Bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Duranske</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/05/08/revisiting-there-reveals-function-over-form/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Duranske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 21:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/05/08/revisiting-there-reveals-function-over-form/#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Hi Raph - welcome, and thanks for the comment.

I may have been imprecise here so I&#039;ll clarify.  By &quot;interface,&quot; I&#039;m only referring to my tools for interacting with the world, not the way the world presents itself to me (which I think There does do really well).  I find the interface tools themselves in There inferior basically across the board, though I have to concede your point that Second Life&#039;s tools have such an incredibly steep learning curve that they are borderline inaccessible for many users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Raph &#8211; welcome, and thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>I may have been imprecise here so I&#8217;ll clarify.  By &#8220;interface,&#8221; I&#8217;m only referring to my tools for interacting with the world, not the way the world presents itself to me (which I think There does do really well).  I find the interface tools themselves in There inferior basically across the board, though I have to concede your point that Second Life&#8217;s tools have such an incredibly steep learning curve that they are borderline inaccessible for many users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raph</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/05/08/revisiting-there-reveals-function-over-form/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Raph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 17:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/05/08/revisiting-there-reveals-function-over-form/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>I disagree that There&#039;s interface is inferior in every way -- and apparently so do you, since you go on to cite several interface things that are better. :)

There is generally regarded as having very good social interaction design. Its interface is far simpler and less flexible than SL&#039;s, but we shouldn&#039;t be blinded, as powerusers, by the flexibility -- it&#039;s also complex and a huge barrier for many users.

In terms of graphics -- both are dated, really, but a fixation on graphics is a mistake. In terms of overall experience, There is more consistent, and that counts for something too. Arguably, both of them, by requiring hardware acceleration, aimed too hig hat initial release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that There&#8217;s interface is inferior in every way &#8212; and apparently so do you, since you go on to cite several interface things that are better. :)</p>
<p>There is generally regarded as having very good social interaction design. Its interface is far simpler and less flexible than SL&#8217;s, but we shouldn&#8217;t be blinded, as powerusers, by the flexibility &#8212; it&#8217;s also complex and a huge barrier for many users.</p>
<p>In terms of graphics &#8212; both are dated, really, but a fixation on graphics is a mistake. In terms of overall experience, There is more consistent, and that counts for something too. Arguably, both of them, by requiring hardware acceleration, aimed too hig hat initial release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
