<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second Life Empty-Box-Scam Silver Lining: At Least There&#8217;s No Intellectual Property Infringement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/05/06/celebrity-skin-scam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/05/06/celebrity-skin-scam/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues That Impact Virtual Worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 04:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Duranske</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/05/06/celebrity-skin-scam/#comment-2601</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Duranske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/05/06/celebrity-skin-scam/#comment-2601</guid>
		<description>Jack, I&#039;m not deleting this comment because for spam trying to drive folks to your site, this is about the most time-intensive effort I&#039;ve seen, and I just have to honor it.  

You seem to have missed the boat on the comment though.  Actually, you seem to have missed the ocean.  This blog is about virtual law, which means it&#039;s about virtual goods, which means no shipping, no weight, and no boxes.  

Good luck with the marketing effort.  Personally, I&#039;d maybe spend the time writing another book instead of leaving semi-random comments on blogs in order to provide a link to your unrelated web site, but hey, it&#039;s your quarter so play the way you want to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, I&#8217;m not deleting this comment because for spam trying to drive folks to your site, this is about the most time-intensive effort I&#8217;ve seen, and I just have to honor it.  </p>
<p>You seem to have missed the boat on the comment though.  Actually, you seem to have missed the ocean.  This blog is about virtual law, which means it&#8217;s about virtual goods, which means no shipping, no weight, and no boxes.  </p>
<p>Good luck with the marketing effort.  Personally, I&#8217;d maybe spend the time writing another book instead of leaving semi-random comments on blogs in order to provide a link to your unrelated web site, but hey, it&#8217;s your quarter so play the way you want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Payne</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/05/06/celebrity-skin-scam/#comment-2595</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/05/06/celebrity-skin-scam/#comment-2595</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t the weight consideration even enter this equation, as a significant factor?  I never could understand this empty box stuff for this reason alone.  It&#039;s so easy to simply refuse delivery.

--Jack Payne
   www.sixhrs.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t the weight consideration even enter this equation, as a significant factor?  I never could understand this empty box stuff for this reason alone.  It&#8217;s so easy to simply refuse delivery.</p>
<p>&#8211;Jack Payne<br />
   <a href="http://www.sixhrs.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.sixhrs.com');">http://www.sixhrs.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
