<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mock Trial of &#8220;Bragg v. Linden&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/01/25/harvards-evidence-2007-in-second-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/01/25/harvards-evidence-2007-in-second-life/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues That Impact Virtual Worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 04:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtually Blind - Virtual Law &#124; Legal Issues That Impact Virtual Worlds &#187; Blog Archive &#187; From the Editor: Commentary on Active Lawsuits and Unsettled Issues in Virtual Law</title>
		<link>http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/01/25/harvards-evidence-2007-in-second-life/#comment-6093</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtually Blind - Virtual Law &#124; Legal Issues That Impact Virtual Worlds &#187; Blog Archive &#187; From the Editor: Commentary on Active Lawsuits and Unsettled Issues in Virtual Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/01/25/harvards-evidence-2007-in-second-life/#comment-6093</guid>
		<description>[...] Where there&#8217;s a gray area in the law (e.g. the validity of recent patent applications on virtual world technology, &#8220;ownership&#8221; of virtual land, and the value of real world currency) I generally try to point that out or approach the issue in a way that makes it clear it is up in the air. Those notes, of course, take a somewhat more neutral tone, and if I do miss a counterargument, readers usually catch it in the comments. Finally, there are some issues that VB confronts &#8212; like the illegality of ponzi schemes, the legality of virtual escort work, and the necessity of Linden Lab complying with the UIGEA &#8212; where the issues appear, from a legal perspective, to be rather black and white. On those, I&#8217;ll continue writing in my usual voice. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Where there&#8217;s a gray area in the law (e.g. the validity of recent patent applications on virtual world technology, &#8220;ownership&#8221; of virtual land, and the value of real world currency) I generally try to point that out or approach the issue in a way that makes it clear it is up in the air. Those notes, of course, take a somewhat more neutral tone, and if I do miss a counterargument, readers usually catch it in the comments. Finally, there are some issues that VB confronts &#8212; like the illegality of ponzi schemes, the legality of virtual escort work, and the necessity of Linden Lab complying with the UIGEA &#8212; where the issues appear, from a legal perspective, to be rather black and white. On those, I&#8217;ll continue writing in my usual voice. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
